#BostonBombings -- The Role of Citizens, Government, and Tech

gretchen-fox-gov20-.png

This is not another post about the pros and cons of citizen journalism or about the shocking terror being experienced by the citizens of Boston, and gripping the world.

This is an invitation to participate in a dialogue with leaders who are coming together TOMORROW to discuss the role of technology in creating a more connected citizenry -- notably during an emergency. This is an area that the people this newsletter reaches can offer a lot of value.

Just as brands need to become social businesses to become the businesses of the future, our government and its citizens must also become a society adept at handling emergencies in the increasingly connected world of the future.

If you were on Twitter or Reddit last night, you were privy to information before anyone watching television. Citizen journalists captured photos and videos live during the shootout, Twitter users aggregated reputable sources into a feed, and the Boston PD sent out warnings to different groups using different hashtags like #MediaAlert and #CommunityAlert. There was some great work happening. But then there was a boy wrongly accused as a suspect on Reddit and a family terrorized for hours.

Socially savvy people understand how to identify reputable sources on Twitter and the importance of cross-checking information before syndicating to their network. But as more and more new people jump into the feed to participate – the bad information is no longer filtered and even worse -- as in the Iran Revolution, dangerous people use the medium to insert misinformation and cause mass confusion.

This is not a topic we can afford to only think about while an emergency is happening -- a lot of infrastructure, process, and knowledge needs to be developed for us to be able to organize in a way that is streamlined and helpful.

This is a real-time world we live in and we need to work together to figure out how to leverage technology to serve society as a whole – not just our clients and our brands.

 Gov 2.0 is tackling these questions with leaders at the intersection of both government and technology. This is why I am attending, and this is why I am a sponsor.

Please, join us tomorrow: Live From Gov 2.0 LA | April 20th  

By Gretchen Fox, Social Architect at grtchnfx 

Posted on April 19, 2013 .

A Framework for Social Advertising

grtchnfx_AFrameworkforSocialAdvertising.png

I’ve been doing a lot of thinking about Social Advertising in preparation for my “Social Ad Crash Course” panel next week at Ad:Tech SF. At the end of the day, everyone wants to know how to use social advertising to drive business objectives -- and anyone working in the space knows there are an awful lot of opinions out there on the topic, and not enough clear data in one place.

I mean, it wasn’t that long ago that social advertising didn’t even exist. And since it has existed, it’s been a pretty bumpy ride. We all felt the ripple of uncertainty when GM publicly announced that Facebook ads don’t pay off.  And very recently, Econsultancy published an article saying social media and advertising are like “oil and water."

As someone who has been working across earned, owned and paid social media for years, I don’t agree … but I get it -- many companies are struggling to find success. The questions become, how do you create engagement through advertisement on platforms where consumers are there to consume content? And then, how do you move people up the slow and windy conversion funnel that is social marketing?

As I kept diving deeper and deeper into these questions, I started trying to boil down a framework that all businesses could use to create great social advertising campaigns that drive business objectives. So far, I’ve come up with three steps that, when done well, lead to success. Those are: Target, Connect, and then Convert.

I created a V1 graphic to represent the three steps for, “A Framework for Social Advertising.” The steps look simple enough, but there are a lot of aspects to consider in each step, and as always, the devil is in the details. For example, targeting has become much more technical and complex.  Ad-serving platform, CitizenNet, now leverages conversation tracking to identify brand new audience targets for brands beyond their core audience, and the company says they have even seen affinity targeting outperform core audience targeting(!). And then very recently, Facebook rolled out new "Lookalike" audiences to allow brands to find audiences on Facebook that are similar to their customer database.

During the panel, we will be looking at examples of Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn campaigns against this framework; learn about social advertising data and trends from Nielsen’s EVP of Product Leadership, Dan Beltramo; and do a deep-dive into some of the best social ad targeting around via Facebook Exchange with Adam Berke, the President of AdRoll, and VP of Digital Strategy at Alex and Ani, Ryan Bonifacino.

If you would like to join the discussion, our session is next Wednesday, April 4th at 1:15PM in Room 3022/3024 (use discount code SF13SPEAK64 to get 25% off of your ticket). If you are unable to attend, you will be able to follow the conversation by using a combo of #socialad and #adtechsf hashtags.

Hope to see you there and looking forward to your feedback on the graphic!

By Gretchen Fox, Social Architect at grtchnfx 

 

 

Posted on April 5, 2013 .

The Problem with the “6 Stages of Social Business Transformation”

altimeter_6tages_socialbusiness_grtchnfx.gif

I was excited to dig into the results of the recent study of 700 executive and social strategists on social strategy development by Altimeter Group’s Brian Solis and Charlene Li.

After six years of having the word “social” in my job title, I wasn’t surprised to see that, of those surveyed, “28% felt that they had a holistic approach to social media,” or that “a mere 12% were confident they had a plan that looked beyond the next year,” or that “only one half of companies surveyed said that top executives were “informed, engaged and aligned with their companies’ social strategy.” Social has been a slow burn on the uptake – for businesses, not for users.

Solis and Li go on to pretty much nail the ideal development process for a social business with their “6 Stages of Social Business Transformation.” I agree with the definition of every stage; although, unfortunately, it’s rare to see them actually develop in this order. For example, Stage 1: Planning – “Listen to Learn,” almost never happens first. Social tends to start with marketing tactics or product integrations and expand from there vs. starting with a real strategy. Regardless, I do think the stages represent the ideal roadmap to social business success.

The biggest problem I found isn’t actually with the stages themselves, it’s in the fact that too many companies are all too happy to skip right over the most important step, Stage 3: Engagement – “Dialog Deepens Relationships.” This stage is described as:

When organizations move into this stage, they make a commitment where social media is no longer a “nice to “have” but instead, is seen as a critical element in relationship building. Key tenets of this stage include participating in conversations to build communities; using engagement and influence to speed path to purchase efficiently; providing support through direct engagement, as well as between people; establishing a risk management and training discipline to shift mindsets; and fostering employee engagement through enterprise social networks.

Please, notice the sentence: participating in conversations to build communities.I would go, as far as to say, this is the single most important value of social media. And as someone who has been in hundreds, if not thousands, of conversations about social, to know – this is where things really go off the rails.

Not only do many companies skip deepening the dialogue with their customers, the issue cuts further than that. The truth is, once you get to this step, you come to find out, many companies really, truly don’t care about their customers at all.

It is hard for me (and most consumers) to understand this mentality, but I run into it more than one might hope. I once had a Sr. Executive at a company tell me, "I don't care about our thousands of current customers! I care about the millions we don't have!" As I picked my jaw up off the floor, my brain processed the gravity of this statement. How did he expect to have a good product if he didn't value his current users and therefore their feedback? How was he going to retain his current users and get any word of mouth if he didn't care enough to invest in those relationships? How was he going to attract new users if the current ones spread word of not being taken care of in a timely, courteous manner? What world does he in that the real users are useless but the potential users would be valuable?

As a consumer advocate, I was astonished. As an employee, I knew I better start thinking about a new job. I might have been early in my career, but even then, I knew this business would fail. And it did. Unfortunately, since then, I have run into this type of thinking at some level at almost every organization.

To be clear, not only should a business care about its consumers, it should LOVE them. It should invest in them. One of my favorite marketing thought leaders is Joseph Jaffe whose book, Flip the Funnel, focuses on this subject. Jaffe’s book details how off the mark most marketers are -- spending the majority of their money attempting to acquire brand new, unqualified customers instead of investing in creating evangelists out of the ones they do have. Show me a company that focuses on their current consumers/readers/fans, and I'll show you a company with a perfect foundation for a social business.

This isn't rocket science and so I'm not sure why it escapes well-educated and experienced executives but here it is:

Have a great product/service that solves a need. Take care of the people who like to use your product. Listen to the feedback from these people -- every day. Engage back with them in real, authentic dialogue -- every day. Make your product and service better based on their feedback. Rinse and repeat.

Once consumers are a priority, then social can deliver word-of-mouth on steroids. But companies that choose to skip this step and go straight to Stage 4: Formalized – “Organize for Scale,” are setting themselves up for disaster. This is when you hear of companies having an issue and then lashing out at users in a panic or covering mistakes up with fake accounts.

Social Business is the future of business, and no companies can get through these 6 Stages if they don’t begin with caring about their customers. This is what people mean when they reference the democratization of the web. People's voices matter. The smartest businesses are figuring out how to harness this power by listening, engaging and giving the people what they ask for, in other words -- building a social business.

What do you think is the best example of a company embracing deep engagement.

By Gretchen Fox, Social Architect at grtchnfx

 

Posted on March 29, 2013 .